If you're a developer or system administrator lured to Mac OS X because of its Unix roots, you'll quickly discover that performing Unix tasks on a Mac is different than what you're accustomed to. Mac OS X for Unix Geeks serves as a bridge between Apple's Darwin OS and the more traditional Unix systems. This clear, concise guide gives you a tour of Mac OS X's Unix shell in both Leopard and Tiger, and helps you find the facilities that replace or correspond to standard Unix utilities. You'll learn how to perform common Unix tasks in Mac OS X, such as using Directory Services instead of the standard Unix /etc/passwd and /etc/group, and you'll be able to compile code, link to libraries, and port Unix software using either Leopard and Tiger. This book teaches you to:. Navigate the Terminal and understand how it differs from an xterm. Use Open Directory (LDAP) and NetInfo as well as Directory Services.
Compile your code with GCC 4. Port Unix programs to Mac OS X with Fink. Use MacPorts to install free/open source software. Search through metadata with Spotlight's command-line utilities.
Build the Darwin kernel And there's much more. Mac OS X for Unix Geeks is the ideal survival guide to tame the Unix side of Leopard and Tiger. If you're a Unix geek with an interest in Mac OS X, you'll soon find that this book is invaluable.
In late 2016 Apple released a new Macbook that they stated would be everything everyone wanted. The result was that the public wasn’t so happy with it. People found themselves needing to use dongles for everything, even SD card readers. The escape key and top command keys were replaced with a gimmicky “touch bar,” and as a result the Macbook had a lukewarm reception. As a result of all this, Linux PC manufacturer System76 reported getting the highest amount of Mac switchers in its history.
It’s safe to say that when it comes to macOS, the honeymoon is over. Longtime users are starting to get fed up with Apple from the way they force everyone to use dongles, to their amateur file system, to the way their operating system takes away advanced functions longtime users are used to using. In this article we’ll go over four of the best Linux distributions that Mac users can install on their new Linux laptops. Elementary OS It is impossible to talk about Mac-like operating systems without talking about the.
This is a Linux distribution that adopts some of the design philosophy that Apple employs into their work: simplicity, beauty, and features. When it comes to this Linux distribution, if you’re coming off of macOS, this is the choice you should consider first and foremost. Elementary has taken a lot of functions and features that some Linux distributions struggle to enable easily (like, for example) and made it so users have a great out-of-the-box experience. If you’re a new Mac user frustrated with Apple and have recently switched, try this version of Linux first. Solus The project is a new one that has only recently gained popularity. Since then their mission has started to resonate with a lot of people: a Linux distribution that works as hard as it can to give you a first class desktop experience. Solus, like Elementary, tries to make it so users aren’t hunting around for software or looking at forum posts in order to figure out how to use their newly-installed Linux distribution.
Budgie is the flagship desktop for Solus, and it is created from scratch to mimic the look and feel of Mac. It comes with a notification area that highly resembles that of macOS. As a Mac user, when you install Solus, you’ll feel right at home. Alternative: is also based on the Budgie desktop and has recently been included as one of the Ubuntu favour. It is based on Ubuntu which gives you a solid core to start with. If you like Solus, chances are you will like Ubuntu Budgie too.
Linux Mint Long before many other Linux distributions tried to do “easy to use Linux,” there was. It was a humble operating system based on Ubuntu that took the time to include little things that beginners have a hard time with: proprietary codecs, the flash plugin, and an easy-to-use Desktop that anyone can pick up. Though Linux Mint is a bit traditional and something that most Mac users will not be familiar with, I encourage them to give it a chance. This is a solid Linux distribution with a reliable set of software that would make any Mac user feel at home.
Ubuntu Gnome The Gnome Shell desktop environment has a lot of similarities when it comes to Mac OS: it has a dock, and it values simplicity instead of piling options on top of options. The Gnome desktop essentially makes Linux way easier to use, as well as modern.
For a Mac user recently switching to Linux, is a good choice. It takes the stability and reliability of the Ubuntu base and combines it with a desktop environment that Mac users can appreciate. Conclusion For a long time Apple was the place to be for a lot of users, including advanced ones. Even if you needed to do technical work, you could at least expect a terminal and reliable hardware.
As of late, Apple seems not really care what its hardcore, advanced users have to say. Instead, they seem to be more focused on perfecting dongles and selling thunderbolt headphones. That’s why users have turned to Linux. For as much negativity that you can give Linux, these new switchers will never need to worry about a Solus developer ending the project to focus on some silly way of replacing the escape key or an Elementary OS developer deleting features. I actually came back over to Linux Mint from Windows 10 after trying several other Linux Distros. The last time I used Linux Mint was with Linux Mint 12 a long time ago. And today’s Linux Mint 18.1 Mate edition to me is by far the best Linux Distro yet.
Not only is it very stable, it is very fast as well and very easy to install software on it. The one thing that really bugged me about all of the other Distros is they have there taskbars on top instead of the bottom like I am used to. Linux Mint has everything where it belongs with the taskbar on the bottom of the screen.
That in itself is what sold me to try Linux Mint once again. I know that sounds trivial to some but to me it’s a big deal to have the taskbar on top instead of on the bottom where it belongs. I believe that in regards to the distro you install it also matters what DESKTOP you choose!you can install Linux Mint with any number of desktops, ranging from XFCE.to KDE.to MATE.and Cinnamon. I think MATE and Cinnamon will feel the most comfortable to most Windows users as those interfaces are designed to be as close to “familiar” as can be for newcomers to Linux. If you want a Windows like experience, but want customization features that are so prevalent they’ll make you dizzy, then you would be best to try KDE.
It too “almost” looks and acts like Windows OS, but their claim to fame is that you can customize just about EVERYTHING. No matter which distro you choose or which desktop, you’re in good company when you choose Linux as your Operating System!! DM, I see that you have retained your insights. Who knows what you – or I – prefer to use and what’s “best”? If I choose to use IceWM, a simple window manager, with a custom antiX setup, maybe this week that is the best. Maybe I want a fast but simple system like MX-16.
Maybe I want to create a system from scratch that uses a graphical user interface only when I am displaying Web browser content? A Linux system might be the best for me, but for the person next to me in the office, maybe Windows 7 Enterprise Edition is the best for what their needs are in the office, but maybe at home they use an iPhone (even if I personally prefer to use an Android device). All of these things are personal preferences and claiming what’s best is arrogance at best and ignorance almost certainly. Personal “what’s best for me” is fine. What is best for you, your neighbors or the people who work for a corporation is for each of these entities to determine for themselves.
“look like” for a new Linux user is a crutch. But, as with any crutch one uses, one eventually puts it aside. Unless one is permanently disabled.
Learning Unix For Mac Os X Tiger
My feeling is that I am trying a different O/S and it will look different. Why would I want the look-and-feel of the old O/S? If I were to switch back to Windows, I certainly would not try to make it like Linux.
First of all, I don’t think I can duplicate the look-and-feel of KDE Plasma. Secondly, why would I want to? It would destroy, or at least cripple, the Windows experience FWIW. I’m less interested in maintaining the aesthetics as I am having things where I’m used to reaching for them. I came up on Windows systems, so the bottom-mounted task bar with the menu, quick launch, window pane and system tray–in that order–is what I’m used to. Having those things where I’m used to them means I can instinctively use my computer. A mac user would instinctively reach for things where they are on a Mac.
Same reason as when you climb into a different manufacturer’s car and say ‘Where the HELL is the headlight switch?”. I lost it with apple about 2 months after I bought a macbook. I HAD to buy Win7 to use boot-camp. I hadn’t learnt how good Parallels was yet.
Mac user group members simply said this is how apple works. When apple refused to upgrade beyond 10.7, I worked harder to get linux working so I could finally dump osx. Mint was my best friend and continues to be my go to distro. I play with other distros occasionally, but something goes wrong and I end up back at Mint. I still need osx occasionally to create usb installs. (I haven’t found a reliable way of adding an efi partition that works on the macbook.
) I had been beating off an ox usb. I needed a new hard drive, so installed osx, to see if anything was better as much as anything else. About 5GB of updates later, I tried to add some other software, but found I need osx 10.9+ to get anything to work.
A minor protest to one software firm has not been answered. Will I try Elementary and Solus – yep. Ubuntu Gnome – I just might try gnome on a rainy day. But I have found Mate works really well. I used to try out a lot of software and Linux distributions.
At this point I use whatever works best for me for a specific task. If I’m reading Email and browsing the Web, I don’t need sophisticated desktop environments that consume huge amount of resources. I’ll select something pretty light, possibly a distribution with a simple window manager and little else. Or I may choose a modest desktop system.
The antiX project allows me to create systems that cater to my interests, small or large, and I can easily modify the system or even rebuild it. AntiX does well and is flexible to provide whatever configuration suits me — clearly it caters to people who are capable of managing and configuring their own systems. I’ve never spent money on an Apple product to this day. And I never will they have nothing that makes or validates a sometimes $1500 / $2500 purchase. I can buy a “middle-of-the-road” laptop, spend some extra to install a larger HDD and max out the RAM to 16GB, install the Linux distro of my choice.and have that machine last for YEARS!And since almost everything is now 64-Bit installs, then I should have no worries for the life of the machine. I too was put through an iMac upgrade that lasted the better part of an hour and a half, only to find out when the download was done that the person’s iMac was too “old” for the newer OS install. I just told the person they should get a new desktop and let me install Linux on it for them.
That was about a year ago, they only RECENTLY reached out to me and asked me to help them with their PC purchase, and the install of Linux. So I guess another Apple-ite has crossed over!LoL! But seriously folks would you pay thousands of dollars for a new car that had no A/C?what about power steering?or headlights and brakes?this is my analogy to Apple. Those items I just mentioned are considered “standard equipment” on the car.so then why would the manufacturer (Apple) remove ports and the like that are considered standard equipment?in order to place a touch-bar that no one asked for.and that no one is going to ever really use? Its like a corporate “slap in the face” to all the consumers who bought the product! But I guess when they start to lose sales at a more rapid rate they’ll finally pay attention huh?LoL! “why would the manufacturer (Apple) remove ports and the like that are considered standard equipment?” Corporate hubris.
WE know best what our users want/need!!! Also corporate greed. Notice that whenever Apple has eliminated a port, it always had a wireless device to replace that functionality for sale. Ever since Fruitco has deep-sixed the PowerPC, they have been building computers more and more with the non-technical inclined user, rather than then the techie. They have been, slowly but surely, returning its computers to the design of the original Mackintosh – a complete sealed black box. I would not be surprised if one of these days, Apple did not come out with a computer without any external connections. Power would be supplied either wirelessly or the device would have a built-in 2-3year battery that had to be replaced by a Fruitco tech when exhausted.
That would be awful!oh waitI use Linuxsooo.NEVERMIND! I guess it just all depends on the user and their wants / needs.
• Emily Bidelspach, Haley Evans, and Jessica Egan all had assists in the win. • Senior had five saves in between the pipes. Kta tennis 1.2 for mac. For the Foes • Nicolette Towlen and Delfina Bracchi scored the Colonel's two goals.
If I had the money that could afford Apple products would I buy them? No.But I think that’s because I’ve been in the IT field for some time now.and I’ve seen what they “really” are. As for the average user?If they have the money then for them buying Apple products just makes sense. It give them everything they use and are used to, it makes them feel as if they belong to a “group” or family of like-minded individuals, and they get a sense of being exclusive for using products that aren’t “typical”. But if you peel away the apple’s skin?you realize you’re not in an exclusive club.but a PRISONas a lot of the apps on your device are not friendly on other hardware. You discover that your feeling of being exclusive in reality is just you being a type of outcast.to a degree.and what you thought of as high-end products just turn out to be overpriced pieces of plastic that you cannot enhance or upgrade with the same level of customizations as other hardware that’s available to the public. This is true.so then you’re proposing this is a trend with ALL PC makers?that they just sit around waiting to see who will make the change first and then they all follow?
I guess this is all the more reason why I’ll stick with the old hardware I have, until its unusable permanently!LoL! Guess this guy got it right huh? I mean in all honestly, what makes us THINK that our PC is slower?and who places in our heads that the.000003 nano-micro-pico-seconds difference is noticeable to all? When in all actuality the ONLY thing that might notice that kinds of speed change would be another computer? Somehow we’ve been brainwashed throughout the decades that if you’re not in possession of the newest, the latest, and greatestthen you’re behind the times. And this started I guess with cars.from their inception it seemed every couple years there was a “newer” model with a few design tweaks, a new set of initials attached to its name (XL.GT.RS) and a new colored interior.but in all actuality it was the same vehicle.
X Unix For Mac Windows 10
I realize that yesa CPU will only last so long, and will only be as fast as it was designed for. But I use Linux, and I don’t have the “Windows creep”.where after time your machine just gets slower and slower (due to temp files, fragments.leftover cruft from past installs etc) My openSuSE desktop has an i5 in itwith 16GB of RAM, and because of the way the Linux filesystem is I don’t have to worry about cruft, or old temp files, so my machine runs excellently. I don’t do video editing, or anything else that has to do with hi-def.audio compression or any of that stuff. I just play music while reading technical articles, (such as this one) and trying to teach myself how to program in Java and Python.so I’m fine with the current speed of my machine.
I don’t envy those with an i7.or who have 1TB of solid state drive space, or who have an IPS-hi-def-4k display.my 23 inch 1080p monitor works just fine. I don’t anticipate changing this machine for a LONG TIME. And yes a lot of newer device have done away with a lot, and have added USB C etc.etcbut since i don’t have to worry about that stuff why do I care if my machine is “old”?
It just seems that a lot of the push for people to stay current with technology is falsely grounded in the rhetoric that if you don’t you’re not fit for society.LoL! I’m just sayin’. Apple is not for eveybody, you should respect that because everybody is different. I alway had high end laptop like dell, hp. My best laptop ever is my macbook pro. I have my macbook pro since 2013. I accidently dropped it on the floor countless time.
This laptop is solid. I travel all the time for work. I need a slim and powerful laptop. I never had a laptop survived me this long and i may keep it for years. Yes since 2013 laptop are better.
Unix For Mac Os X Users
Thank you apple to change the rules, otherwise, we would still have bulky laptop. I’m not a OSX user. I’m a linux user who like awesome hardware. Tried Elementary OS – looks nice if that’s your thing – but!
Once you install non-intergrated apps that consistency falls apart. Gnome plus decent themes and icon set looks just as nice if not better. However, the thing that really drove me away was the god-awful touchpad feel. Pointer acceration all over the place when you don’t need it. Makes it very difficult to zero in on controls, even at slow speed, and there’s zero inertia when swipe-scrolling. Trust me, if you’re used to the silky and accurate feel of a Mac trackpad, you’ll be very dissapointed with Elementary. I have a feeling that it’s using libinput rather than the Synaptics driver – until libinput is more widely supported (in particular, inertia scrolling) and more configuarable (accelleration, sensitivity, disable while typing, etc), for me, it’s just unusable.